Court Rules Anti-gay Workplace Bias Allowed Under Existing Law
By Chris Johnson, Washington Blade
Originally printed 3/16/2017 (Issue 2511 - Between The Lines News)
A federal appeals court has ruled against a lesbian employee seeking relief after being harassed and forced out of her job, declining to accept arguments discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation violates existing laws against gender bias.
In a 2-1 decision, a three-judge panel on the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars discrimination on the basis of sex, affords no protections to Jameka Evans, a security guard targeted for harassment and effectively terminated from her job at Georgia Regional Hospital for being a lesbian.
U.S. District Judge Jose Martinez, a George W. Bush appointee sitting by designation on the 11th Circuit, ruled Title VII doesn't prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation based on the federal appeals court's existing precedent, such as the 1979 decision in Blum v. Gulf Oil Corp.
"Evans and the EEOC question these decisions, in part, because of Price Waterhouse and Oncale," Martinez writes. "Whether those Supreme Court cases impact other circuit's decisions, many of which were decided after Price Waterhouse and Oncale, does not change our analysis that Blum is binding precedent that has not been overruled by a clearly contrary opinion of the Supreme Court or of this Court sitting en banc. Accordingly, we affirm the portion of the district court's order dismissing Evan's sexual orientation claim."
The decision largely upholds a ruling from a district court, which dismissed the complaint Evans filed against her former employer in 2015 on the basis that Title VII doesn't protect her as a lesbian. The district court later allowed the appointment of the LGBT legal group Lambda Legal to represent Evans, who initially filed the lawsuit on her own accord. Lambda argued on her behalf before the 11th Circuit in oral arguments in December.
But Martinez also allows Evans to amend her complaint to sue on the basis that she was discriminated on the job based on sex stereoptying. The decision found "she did not provide enough factual matter to plausibly suggest that her decision to present herself in a masculine manner led to the alleged adverse employment actions," which led the district court to reject that argument as well. Thus the 11th Circuit affirms the district court's order in part, vacates it in part and remands it for further proceedings.
Had the court ruled in favor of Evans, it would have the first-time ever a federal appeals court found Title VII prohibits discrimination against lesbian, gay and bisexual people. Although a growing number of trial courts and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission have found anti-gay discrimination is barred under current law, no federal appeals court have thus far subscribed that view. Meanwhile, federal appeals courts have created substantial case law finding Title VII bars discrimination against transgender people.
U.S. Circuit Judge William Pryor, another appointee of George W. Bush, wrote a concurring opinion expressing frustration the EEOC in the case of Baldwin v. Foxx would find discrimination based on sexual orientation is the same as discrimination based on gender stereotypes.
"But just as a woman cannot recover under Title VII when she is fired because of her heterosexuality, neither can a gay woman sue for discrimination based on her sexual orientation," Pryor said. "Deviation from a particular gender stereotype may correlate disproportionately with a particular sexual orientation, and plaintiffs who allege discrimination on the basis of gender nonconformity will often also have experienced discrimination because of sexual orientation. But under Title VII, we ask only whether the individual experienced discrimination for deviating from a gender stereotype."
Pryor's opinion contrasts with an earlier decision he joined in 2011 finding the prohibition of sex discrimination under Title VII applies to transgender people. It should be noted Pryor was reportedly on President Trump's short list as a potential replacement for the late U.S. Associate Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court.
Dissenting from the decision was U.S. Circuit Judge Robin Rosenbaum, an Obama appointee, who wrote the panel "ignores this clear mandate" the Supreme Court delivered in the 1989 Price Waterhouse decision that workplace discrimination based on sex stereotyping is unlawful.
"Plain and simple, when a woman alleges, as Evans has, that she has been discriminated against because she is a lesbian, she necessarily alleges that she has been discriminated against because she failed to conform to the employer's image of what women should be -- specifically, that women should be sexually attracted to men only," Rosenbaum writes. "And it is utter fiction to suggest that she was not discriminated against for failing to comport with her employer's stereotyped view of women."
Now that the decision has come down, Lambda has the option of either letting the decision stand, seeking an "en banc" rehearing before the full 11th Circuit or filing a petition from certiorari to seek redress before the Supreme Court. The organization announced in a statement it has settled on the second option.
"This is not the end of the road for us and certainly not for Jameka," said Lambda's employment fairness project director Greg Nevins. "Keeping your job shouldn't depend on whether or not you pass for straight. There is no way to draw a line between sexual orientation discrimination and discrimination based on gender nonconformity because not being straight is gender-nonconforming, period. Ninety percent of Americans believe that LGBT people should be treated equally in the workplace. The public is on the right side of history, and it's time for the 11th Circuit to join us."Chris Johnson is Chief Political & White House Reporter for the Washington Blade. Johnson attends the daily White House press briefings and is a member of the White House Correspondents' Association.This article originally appeared in the Washington Blade and is made available in partnership with the National Media Association.
- South Dakota Governor Signs First Anti-LGBT Law of 2017
- Court Rules Anti-gay Workplace Bias Allowed Under Existing Law
- Spicer Denounces Anti-LGBT Violence -- Sort Of
- N.H. lawmakers table transgender rights bill
- 3 LGBT Community Centers Vandalized in Disturbing New Trend
- DeVos Meets with LGBT Groups Over Trans Student Protections
- Justice Delayed in Gavin Grimm Case, But For How Long?
- Transgender Task Force Relaunched Amid Ongoing Anti-trans Attacks
- Gay Trump Supporters Rally in D.C.
- White House: Court Remand of Gavin Grimm Case a 'Routine Practice'
- Carson Confirmed to HUD with Support from 6 Democrats
- Judge Says Pulse Gunman's Wife Should Stay in Jail, For Now
- Supreme Court Scraps Consideration of Gavin Grimm Case
- Trump's Speech to Congress Mixes Bleak Outlook with populist view
- Spicer Hints at Coming Action on Anti-LGBT 'Religious Freedom' Order
- Arkansas Supreme Court Strikes Down Pro-LGBT City Ordinance
- Schumer: Dems Will 'Do Whatever We Can' to Reverse Trans Rollback
- Protesters: Trump a 'Bully' for Rescinding Trans Student Protections
- White House: Trans Student Bathroom Access a State Issue
- Wash. Court Rules Against Florist who Refused to Serve Gays
- AIDS/HIV Organizations
- Unified - HIV Health and Beyond
- Comerica Bank
- Safe Space Therapeuric Services LLC
- National Organizations
- Human Rights Campaign
- Opera Company
- Arbor Opera Theater
- Professional Organizations
- Ties Like Me
- Religious & Spiritual
- Congregation Shir Tikvah
- Buca Di Beppo
- Youth Services
- PLUS - People Like Us
Enter contests to win great prizes like CDs, DVDs, concert tickets and more
- EXCLUSIVE: Susan Sarandon on 'Up For Grabs' Sexuality, Ryan Murphy's 'Feud' & Her Response to Those Who 'Blame Me' For the Election
- Making America Hopeful Again: Dustin Lance Black Talks 'When We Rise,' the Power of Collective Protesting & Why He 'Calls Bulls***' on Trans-Evading Hollywood
- Equality Michigan's New Strategy is Bold Risk in This Political Season
- PTA TMI
- Q&A: LeAnn Rimes on HRC Ally Award, Avoiding Political Talk & the Closeted Country Stars Who Motivated Her Activism
Sign up to receive our weekly newsletters today!
This Week's Issue
Download or view this week's print issue today!
Sign up to receive our weekly newsletters today!