After Thwarted Kidnapping Plans, Whitmer Calls for Unity

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer addressed the State of Michigan after a plan to kidnap her and other Michigan government officials was thwarted by state and federal law enforcement agencies. She started by saying thank you to law enforcement and FBI agents who participated in stopping this [...]


Make Michigan Progressive Again.

Get the 2020 Michigan Progressive Voters Guide and find out which candidates on your personal ballot are dedicated to supporting progressive politics and equality and justice for all Americans.

Get My Voter Guide

Attorney General sues to block domestic partner benefits

By |2011-05-12T09:00:00-04:00May 12th, 2011|News|

By Tara Cavanaugh

Attorney General Bill Schuette announced on May 6 that he is suing the Michigan Civil Service Commission. The MCSC decided in January to offer benefits to unrelated adults living with state employees, and Schuette is challenging the constitutionality of that decision.
“This unconstitutional use of authority is costing the taxpayers millions at a time when they can least afford it,” Schuette said.
Schuette claims the benefits exceed the Consitutional authority granted to the MCSC and they violate the state’s equal protection clause.
The MCSC, an independent office that administers human resources for state employees, negotiated with state employee unions to offer domestic partner benefits under Gov. Jennifer Granholm. But in 2004, Michigan voters added an amendment to the state constitution that defined marriage as only between a man and a woman. That amendment, known as Proposition 2, also demanded that any benefits of marriage – such as health benefits – only occur between a man and a woman. In response, state universities that had offered “same-sex partner” benefits changed their language to offer “other eligible adult” benefits. This allows unrelated roommates and their dependents to receive benefits even under Prop 2. The MCSC decision is similar in purpose.
The AG isn’t the only one trying to remove the benefits. State Republicans tried to overturn the MCSC decision in February and March. They needed a two-thirds majority vote in both the state House and Senate. Republicans managed the majority in the Senate, but not the House. The benefits are set to take effect in October.
House Republicans are also attacking the benefits again, this time financially. They wrote langauge in their version of the state budget that would penalize universities who offer “other eligible adult” benefits with a five percent cut in funding.
Although the attorney general said he’s challenging the constitutionality of the MCSC decision, his complaints – and complaints of fellow Republican lawmakers, including Gov. Rick Snyder – mostly decry the cost.
Schuette claims the benefits will cost up to $8 million. Democratic Senator Rebekah Warren from Ann Arbor told BTL in March that there was no way to know exactly how much the benefits would cost, but did not think it would be as high as Republican projections.
The MCSC needs to respond to the suit by May 27.

About the Author:

BTL Staff
Between The Lines has been publishing LGBTQ-related content in Southeast Michigan since the early '90s. This year marks the publication's 27th anniversary.