Boyfriend vs. Partner: The Quiet Marriage Expectations Behind the Words
For some queer people, calling someone a 'boyfriend' isn’t immature — it’s a way of reclaiming a milestone many of us were denied growing up
No one ever listens to me. Every time I call Renzo my boyfriend, people rechristen him as my "partner." Moments later, I reassert that he is my "boyfriend," making the implicit criticism as obvious as Gala Varo's tuck on “Drag Race México.” And yet, the person still invites me and my "partner" out for drinks afterwards. Why, Gaga, why? Also, I don’t drink.
I know it's polite among heterosexuals to call someone's romantic S.O. their partner since it acknowledges the declining power of the marriage-industrial complex, but for me, the word "boyfriend" reclaims an entire lived experience that I lost from being a queer person growing up in a conservative area. I never had a "boyfriend" in high school as many of my straight peers did. I was too busy dodging food and ignoring cruel insults to find — let alone connect with — a compatible queer person in my universe. But now that I have a healthy relationship, I'm finally proud to say that I have a boyfriend. Also, why would I want such a serious label, anyway? I don’t want to use a word that, for many queers, can signify a liminal space between boyfriend and marriage.
“Boyfriend” is my shield against marriage and my repossession of my past.
Before same-gender marriage death-dropped into reality in 2015, “partner” was — to borrow YouTube lingo — S tier. It was the icon, the legend, the moment. The goal. After you worked through your one-night stands (F-tier), DL duds (E-tier), booty calls (D-tier), vacation boyfriends and girlfriends (C-tier), first failed long-term romances (B-tier) and Maybe-It-Could-Works (A-tier), you finally found The One. This person became your “partner”: your counterfeit spouse and greatest chance at integrating into heterosexual society.
Then marriage equality came along, and with the heteronormative institution of marriage available to all, “partner” finally shed its skin, revealing itself as the ersatz, even feeble, facsimile of legal spousehood that it really was. Yet, it still carried more status than “boyfriend” or “girlfriend.” Queer millennials coming of age during the 2000s and 2010s still knew, instinctively, that if they began calling their boyfriend or girlfriend their partner, it meant something. It signified to heteros that they, too, honored and sanctified monogamy and would eventually get married, like them.
Then, around the mid 2010s, heterosexual people began to realize that marriage wasn’t as cracked up as Gen X and Boomers had made it out to be. They eschewed marriage, raging against its failings and hypocrisies, and sought an alternative arrangement which nevertheless expressed love and commitment. They also sought a word that could represent all this. All the better if the word could be edgy somehow, if it could make someone think for even a second that the speaker might be queer. Thus, “partner” went mainstream.
There was irony in how “partner” leapt from queer communities to heterosexual parlance, and it was in the timing. This shift seemed to come just as many young queer people — myself included — began questioning the inherent heteronormativity of marriage. Not all of us wanted big weddings. The concept of marriage had been shoved down our throats by every book, movie, social gathering and dinner with the parents from time immemorial. We were not ungrateful for the work our forebears had put in to achieve marriage equality, but we had become weary of conforming to social norms. We had been doing it all our lives, after all. So, we largely replaced “spouse” with “partner” as well.
All of this to say, once again, that I hate it when people hoist “partner” on me. When I’m expected by my straight friends to use “partner,” it’s like being expected by them to get married all over again, but with cooler lingo. Why must I conform to yet another expectation? Why can’t I say “boyfriend” without someone leveling me up? I want a “boyfriend.” I want all the secret kisses, late nights, alleyway makeouts, wilted roses, superficial status and furious rebellion that the word implies. I want that explosive moment when I say the word out loud to my parents for the first time, changing our relationship forever. I want that feeling of walking down the hall, hand in hand, and everyone thinking, “They’re boyfriends.” Of course, it’s not Brittany from Biology thinking this, now that I’m an adult. It’s some random 60-year-old Aunt Gladys in Food Lion.
But that’s still what I want.
Indeed, that’s what I never had, coming of age in a beet red region of Virginia in the early 2000s, pre-Gay Lance Bass.
There’s also the simple matter of me and my boyfriend only being together for three years. Need I remind you that the word “partner” still has a reputation as a stepping stone to marriage for queers? Perhaps it’s not that I want to linger in this boyfriend stage simply to regain something lost. Perhaps it’s also that I don’t want a larger commitment just yet, respectability politics be damned. My fellow queers will keep getting married and I’ll keep fighting alongside them for that right, but my personal participation is not necessary for the future of the institution. That will come when I’m good and ready. You’ll all know when it happens because I’ll start calling that guy I’m always with my partner.
It’s funny, because in Peru, where I now live with my boyfriend Renzo, there’s no extra connotation surrounding the word “pareja,” or partner. Here, it doesn’t mean anything serious and it’s practically synonymous with “boyfriend” or “girlfriend.” Of course, I didn’t know that when Renzo, after a year of dating me, introduced us as “parejas” at a party. I blacked out in that moment: red lights danced across my vision and screeching tire brakes obliterated my eardrums. I thought my life was over. I thought I had wound up in a gay “Fatal Attraction.” We’ve worked things out since then.
But I still won’t call Renzo my partner. At least not in English.