Funding Proposals Advance in House and Senate

By |2007-06-28T09:00:00-04:00June 28th, 2007|News|

By Bob Roehr

WASHINGTON, DC – The President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) will receive an increase from $1.25 billion to $5.08 billion for the next fiscal year. The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Bush proposal for international HIV programs on June 22.
Of equal importance, it took a baby step toward rolling back some of the restrictions that social conservatives have imposed on the program. It modified the current requirement that a third of prevention funding go to abstinence-only programs, giving the president authority to waive that provision should he see fit.
Social conservatives fought hard to restore the more restrictive language but failed on a vote of 200 to 226. The vote was largely along party lines, but 15 Democrats crossed one way while 10 Republicans crossed in the other direction to assure the victory.
The second provision allows the federal government to provide contraceptive materials, including condoms, to international organizations that provide abortions as part of their comprehensive reproductive health services. That prohibition, often referred to as the Mexico City Policy, had been in place since the Reagan administration.
The battle was hard-fought and the outcome even closer, 205 to 218 – a bare majority of the House. Some 25 Democrats defected from their party on that vote, with 12 Republicans supplying the margin of victory.
Chief sponsor Rep. Nita Lowey (D-New York) said, “What I did was put in a very narrow provision that will reduce abortion, unintended pregnancy and reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS.”
Supporters of reproductive rights bit their tongues, acknowledging the politically difficult situation. While right-winger Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, said Lowey was pushing to make the United States “a merchant of abortion,” adding that “America will be known as an exporter of death.”
It is unlikely Bush will avail himself of the flexibility that these provisions allow. The provision affecting the Mexico City Policy may even draw a rare presidential veto.
The Senate Appropriations Committee cut $28.5 million from what President Bush requested for community-based abstinence-only programs when it met on June 21. Earlier in the month a House subcommittee increased funding for those programs by $27 million, much to the dismay of liberal supporters of science-based programs for reproductive health.
Human Rights Campaign president Joe Solmonese used the carrot approach, praising the Senate committee for reducing funding for “programs (that) are ineffective and based on narrow, right-wing ideology.”
But that wasn’t enough for Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. “The fact that Congress is allocating even one dollar to a thoroughly debunked and harmful program is an outrage. … Abstinence-only programs are a sham and congressional Democrats can and must defund those programs now.”
The measure also offers a modest $33 million increase for all of Ryan White AIDS programs and almost a billion dollars more for the National Institutes of Health, one of the most popular of all federal programs. It offered no increase in HIV prevention programs at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, even though the Bush administration had asked for an additional $93 million.

About the Author:

BTL Staff
Between The Lines has been publishing LGBTQ-related content in Southeast Michigan since the early '90s. This year marks the publication's 27th anniversary.