Roe v. Wade Was Just Overturned. Now What?

It is an all-hands-on-deck moment in Michigan and our nation. Today’s opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade should be a siren blaring in the night, waking people up from every corner of the country and motivating them to take action — [...]

Parting Glances: Other voices; Other Gay Back Rooms

By |2020-09-16T12:13:07-04:00September 16th, 2020|Opinions, Parting Glances|

For over 50 years, Life magazine informed Americans about what was happening here and abroad. Photos and content were dramatic. Mostly conservative. Occasionally controversial. Once in a while, downright shocking.
Life folded in 1973; circulation 13 million. Readership, 10 times that amount. Its sister publication, Time, continues to this day.
Five years before the Stonewall Riots of 1969, Life tackled a scary taboo: “Homosexualities in America.” An expose focusing on the gay underworld of New York, Chicago and San Francisco. America’s collective Sodom and Gomorrahs.
Middle-class Americans woke up to the realization that homosexuals were growing in number. Becoming alarmingly visible. A social threat to be somehow remedied.
In 1964, San Francisco was not the dynamic gay center of Castro/Market Street, clone-look militancy. It hadn’t the high-density population complex of the 1970s and pre-AIDS 1980s; but Life’s wide-audience article — unintentionally, to be sure — served as a catalyst for early gay migration there.
Life opened its expose head-on: “Homosexuality shears across the spectrum of American life: the professional, the arts, business and labor. It always has. But today, especially in big cities, homosexuals are discarding their furtive ways and openly admitting, even flaunting, their deviation.
“Homosexuals have their own drinking places, their special assignation streets, even their own organizations. And for every obvious homosexual, there are probably nine nearly impossible to detect. This social disorder, which society tries to suppress, has forced itself into the public eye because it does present a problem — and parents especially are concerned.
“The myth and misconception with which homosexuality has so long been clothed must be cleared away, not to condone it but to cope with it.”
Accompanying the 14-page belly shock are a dozen photos. Nameless gay men clustered in dark bars or milling about on dimly lighted streets.
“These brawny young men in their leather caps, shirts, jackets and pants are practicing homosexuals, men who turn to other men for affection and sexual satisfaction,” the piece read. “They are part of what they call the ‘gay world,’ which is actually a sad and often sordid world.”
Gay bars are exposed: “As each new customer walks into the dimly lit room, he will lock eyes with a half dozen young men before reaching his place at the bar. Throughout the evening there is a constant turnover of customers as contacts are made and two men slip out together, or individuals move on to other bars in search of better luck.
“As 2 a.m. closing time approaches, the atmosphere grows perceptibly more tense. It is the ‘frantic hour,’ the now-or-never time for making a contact.”
Sound familiar?
Here’s the early version of the gay agenda: “As part of its anti-homosexual drive the Los Angeles police force has compiled an ‘educational’ pamphlet for law enforcement officers entitled, ‘Some Characteristics of the Homosexual.’
The strongly opinionated pamphlet includes the warning that what the homosexuals really want is a ‘fruit world.'” (Not a cocktail.)
Gays in the military, 1964: “If we didn’t throw them out, we’d be condoning homosexuality. The services’ position has to be that homosexual practices prejudice morale and discipline.”
Life warns, “For the first time the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the homosexual case, but no legal procedures are likely to change society’s basic repugnance to homosexuality as an immoral and disruptive force that should somehow be removed.”
Lest we forget. Time 2020 marches on. What’s past is prologue. Profile. (And! with Trump and the Rebiblicans in power), perhaps once more an alarming possibility somehow to be removed.

About the Author:

Charles Alexander