As the world continues to learn more about coronavirus and its spread, it's vital to stay up-to-date on the latest developments. However, it's also important to make sure that the information being distributed is from credible sources. To that end, Between The Lines has compiled, [...]
For over 50 years Life magazine informed Americans about what was happening here and abroad. Photos and content were dramatic. Mostly conservative. Occasionally controversial. Once in awhile downright shocking.
Life folded in 1973. Circulation 13 million. Readership, 10 times that amount. Its sister publication, Time, marches on to this day.
Five years before the Stonewall Riots of 1969, Life tackled a scary taboo: “Homosexualities in America.” An expose focusing on the gay underworld. New York! Chicago! San Francisco! America’s collective Sodoms and Gomorrahs.
Middle Americans woke up to the realization that homos were growing in number. Becoming alarmingly visible. A social threat to be somehow remedied. Militancy! Leather! Bars! Codpieces! Parades!
In 1964, San Francisco was not the dynamic gay center of Castro/Market Street, clone-look militancy. It hadn’t the high-density population complex of the 1970s and pre-AIDS 1980s; but Life’s wide-audience article — unintentionally, to be sure — served as a catalyst for early gay migration there.
Life opened its scare head-on: “Homosexuality shears across the spectrum of American life: the professional, the arts, business and labor. It always has. But today, especially in big cities, homosexuals are discarding their furtive ways and openly admitting, even flaunting, their deviation.
“Homosexuals have their own drinking places, their special assignation streets, even their own organizations. And for every obvious homosexual, there are probably nine nearly impossible to detect.
“This social disorder, which society tries to suppress, has forced itself into the public eye because it does present a problem — and parents especially are concerned.
“The myth and misconception with which homosexuality has so long been clothed must be cleared away, not to condone it but to cope with it.”
Accompanying the 14-page belly shock are a dozen photos. Nameless gay men clustered in dark bars or milling about on dimly lighted streets. “These brawny young men in their leather caps, shirts, jackets and pants are practicing homosexuals, men who turn to other men for affection and sexual satisfaction.
“They are part of what they call the ‘gay world,’ which is actually a sad and often sordid world.”
Gay bars are exposed: “As each new customer walks into the dimly lit room, he will lock eyes with a half dozen young men before reaching his place at the bar. Throughout the evening there is a constant turnover of customers as contacts are made and two men slip out together, or individuals move on to other bars in search of better luck.
“As closing time — 2 a.m. — approaches, the atmosphere grows perceptibly tenser. It is the ‘frantic hour,’ the now-or-never time for making a contact.” Sound familiar?
Here’s the early version of the gay agenda: “As part of its anti-homosexual drive the Los Angeles police force has compiled an ‘educational’ pamphlet for law enforcement officers entitled, ‘Some Characteristics of the Homosexual.’
The strongly opinionated pamphlet includes the warning that what the homosexuals really want is a ‘fruit world.’” (Not a cocktail.)
Gays in the military, 1964: “If we didn’t throw them out, we’d be condoning homosexuality. The services’ position has to be that homosexual practices prejudice morale and discipline.”
Life warns, “For the first time the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the homosexual case, but no legal procedures are likely to change society’s basic repugnance to homosexuality as an immoral and disruptive force that should somehow be removed.”
Somehow removed? Maybe AIDS possibly? Afterthoughts on Trump, Pence, the GOP, anyone? Please share as warnings on Grindr.